Trump Should Pardon WikiLeaks Founder Julian Assange

Some would argue "Giving Julian Assange a pardon would send the wrong message," I Say, "No worse than Bill Clinton pardoning Marc Rich"



The way the news media covers Trump, do you think the world is seeing a great message now? Giving Julian Assange a pardon would be no worse than...

The courts setting the convicted deserter Bowe Bergdahl free.
The DNC rigging the 2016 Democratic primaries,.
Certainly no worse than when President Bill pardoned Marc Rich.

We won't even get into the messages the Clinton Crime Cartel has been sending to the world about America.  Just ask the Haitian people about what the Clinton Foundation did to that country... You'll get an earful about the message we sent them in their most desperate hour.

President Trump giving a pardon to the WikiLeaks founder in exchange for his testimony about where the Podesta e-mails came from,  any information on the death of Seth Rich and any connections between Hillary and Russia that he has yet to release. 

Julian Assange's testimony would go a long way in ending the Mueller Special Prosecutor Witch Hunt.

There is already ample evidence that Mueller should recuse himself from the sham known as "The investigation into Russia's involvement in the 2016 election"

If this was any other time and news networks like CNN was transported back to the days James Earl Jones was saying "This is CNN" things would be different.

Unfortunately, for Trump CNN now only covers Black holes that suck up airplanes. How many scoops of Ice Cream Trump receives compared to reporters.  Does Penis size match finger length?  By the way, It doesn't and neither does your shoe size.

 
Conflict of Interest
Even though the Democrats act oblivious to the fact that Mueller was deeply involved with many of the same Russian connections that he is investigating. His right-hand man Andrew Weissmann is the person whose signature is on the Gag order that forbid a witness with inside information about the Uranium One deal from testifying in front of Congress.
So how is that NOT a conflict of interest?

 
Bad Message?


While a pardon for Assange seems unlikely, Trump should consider it.  Assange may not even accept a pardon since his testimony must be a condition of it.

I highly doubt even the Big three, CNN and MSNBC could fail to report on his appearance on Capital Hill.  The attention that was paid to Comey's testimony would amount to nothing if Assange ever arrived in Washington to testify about what he knows and what evidence he may present.

 


 
Fake News


The way fake news is covering Trump now is reprehensible. So, what does Trump have to lose by pardoning Assange? His good name? His sterling reputation with the press? His fair treatment by MSM?

Just yesterday the fake News media suggested that Trump’s behavior feeding some Koi  fish in a pond could launch a “diplomatic incident.” The fake news media claimed Trump dumped a whole box of food into the pond and it may kill the precious little darlings.

They would have gotten away with it if a video did show them what actually happened. CNN had the video but the cropped it so all you saw was Trump dumping the box of food. The real video showed Trump dumping the box of food ONLY AFTER Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe did it first.

If it wasn't for the dim-witted Don Lemon we may not have ever found out that CNN was trying desperately to plant the seed for a "One Person, One Vote" narrative. If they didn't get caught you could be assured for weeks after the election CNN would have covered that. Instead, we were treated to an equally fake Russia, Trump collusion.

If Trump can't get a fair shake with the media while feeding f*cking fish then screw it, give Assange a pardon.

There is ample evidence that shows the only collusion that took place was between Russia and Hillary. An Assange pardon would be a huge step in the right direction.

https://youtu.be/rP_d_J7RCY4

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || ).push({});

Seth Rich
Assange hinted that he knew who killed, or at least he knew why Seth Rich was gunned down.  The death of the 27-year-old DNC staffer has been the source of countless conspiracy theories. The most followed are from people who claim he was killed because of his connection to Wikileaks.

Police say that Mr. Rich was the victim of a robbery gone wrong, he was found shot in the back still in possession of his wallet, credit cards, and cell phone. His wristwatch was torn but not broken. While I do not believe in tin-plated conspiracy nuts, there is something to be said about Assange's interview with Fox News.

The moment I saw it, I thought "OMG Assange knows who killed him."  Under normal circumstances, I do not believe Assange would ever betray his vow never to expose anyone sending information to WikiLeaks.

If Seth Rich was the leaker, then that information coming to light could lead to his killers and something that I believe Assange could be comfortable with breaking his vow in this one instance.

Trump should at least toss the "Assange Pardon" into the media ring. Those in the media will think "Trump is crazy enough to do it." Maybe some will be so worried they will come forward or start to report on real stories and not two scoops of anything.

 
The Podesta Emails 
Assange and Wikileaks have never been proven wrong, and while people like Podesta will say "Are you going to believe emails that were stolen?" You have never heard Podesta, Hillary or any Democrat even hint that "Wikileaks made this up."

Trump has no one except maybe FOX, to tell the truth. Since FOX has been so tarnished by the lies coming from the Dems that half the country would not believe a word from them anyway. Even if FOX had verifiable proof.

It's time Trump made a deal with Julian Assange so we can take another step toward exposing the crimes that Hillary had perpetrated on America for the past 2 decades and all those companies like FaceBook, Google and Twitter who colluded with that old bat to try to steal the election from the American people.


Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg to Hilliary Clinton campaign head John Podesta Part of the WikiLeaks series on deals involving Hillary Clinton campaign Chairman John Podesta. Mr Podesta is a long-term associate of the Clintons and was President Bill Clinton's Chief of Staff from 1998 until 2001. Mr Podesta also owns the Podesta Group with his brother Tony, a major lobbying firm and is the Chair of the Center for American Progress (CAP), a Washington DC-based think tank.

Read the full article