Image: Matt Rourke (AP)

In Twitter’s ongoing crusade against the rampant abuse on its platform that it keeps promising to address (no, legit guys) (this time for realsies), the company recently announced it’s testing a new filter to hopefully help keep trash out of your DMs.

“Unwanted messages aren’t fun,” the company tweeted Thursday in what’s perhaps one of the greatest understatements of the year. So very-not-fun, in fact, that last year Twitter implemented its first direct message filter for accounts open to DMs from anyone. It better delineates those from mutuals versus those from strangers by filing them in separate folders.

With Thursday’s new filter, now in addition to possibly sketchy “Message requests” from people you don’t follow, there are the most definitely sketchy “Additional messages” from people you don’t follow whose messages “may contain offensive content.” The latter aren’t visible until users opt to see them.

How effective Twitter will be at identifying potentially abusive content in these DMs, though, is another question. The platform has historically relied on users flagging material that might violate its terms of service, though the company’s reportedly been making strides in preemptively flagging content via algorithms. In an April blog post, Twitter announced that “38% of abusive content that’s enforced is surfaced proactively to our teams for review instead of relying on reports from people on Twitter.”

While that’s certainly progress, it has to be taken with a grain of salt when you remember the fact that a Twitter executive recently stated that there’s still a large divide between what the platform and its users consider to be offensive. “A lot of what people consider abusive on the service doesn’t actually violate our policies,” Twitter executive Kayvon Beykpour said in June at Recode’s Code Conference.

This discrepancy may explain, to cite one example, why the platform continues to host several prominent white supremacists despite the many users and civil rights groups calling for their removal. So while I’d love to see this new filter successfully weed out abuse in my inbox, given that Twitter seems to have a different definition of abuse than most of its users, excuse me if I don’t get my hopes up.

Gizmodo reached out to Twitter and will update this story with their response.

Source link